![]() ![]() Leave a comment in the document by selecting a portion of text, and clicking on the comment icon.Īlternatively, you can select the text, and choose Insert > Comment on the menu at the top of the page, or use the keyboard shortcut for your computer. Please leave feedback in the Google doc using either the Comments tool or by providing feedback with the Suggestions tool. This helps to draw their attention to any areas you think need particular consideration, and helps ensure the feedback you receive is valuable. This is where you can add guiding questions for reviewers that are specific to your project. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. It should make use of examples that are inclusive of a variety of races, ethnicities, and backgrounds. Cultural Relevance: The text is not culturally insensitive or offensive in any way.Grammatical Errors: The text contains no grammatical errors.Organization Structure Flow: The topics in the text are presented in a logical, clear fashion.Consistency: The text is internally consistent in terms of terminology and framework.Clarity: The text is written in lucid, accessible prose, and provides adequate context for any jargon/technical terminology used.The text is written and/or arranged in such a way that necessary updates will be relatively easy and straightforward to implement. Relevance Longevity: Content is up-to-date, but not in a way that will quickly make the text obsolete within a short period of time.Content Accuracy: Content is accurate, error-free and unbiased. ![]() Comprehensiveness: The text covers all areas and ideas of the subject appropriately and provides an effective index and/or glossary.“To what extent is the book successful in meeting the needs of its primary market?” If there were one single question your review should seek to answer, it should probably be: The audience will primarily consist of undergraduates pursuing the major, however can also include some mixed-major undergraduates.” You can include as much detail as you think is necessary, such as technical requirements, reading levels, etc. For example: “This book is meant for use in first-year introductory courses. Insert a few sentences about the book’s intended audience here. You should also link to project info page, so interested readers can learn more. Include a quick summary and description of your project and book here. Take a moment to read through the project summary to familiarise yourself with the book’s purpose and audience before beginning your review. No OER textbook can serve all learners, so it is important to be aware of the context the book is meant to live in. Your name will be mentioned in the published version of the book as reviewer. Before We BeginĪs we strive to work openly, all contributions made to this textbook will be licensed under a CC BY 4.0 International License. If you have any questions, email the project lead. Please read through sections below, and use this as a reference as you complete your review. You are welcome to print this Google doc, make a copy for yourself, or share with others. This guide is meant to help you give great, useful feedback on the open textbooks we are helping to develop. ![]() Welcome to the guide for Rebus open textbook reviewers. Our thanks to Billy and the team at BCcampus. Find an editable version here. This template was adapted from a similar work created by Billy Meinke at the University of Hawaii, and includes a rubric developed by BCcampus. This template may be used as you’re conducing peer review on your project in Google Docs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |